<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civilizational Resilience and Limitless Modes of Consciousness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embraceunity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embraceunity.com/?p=205</link>
	<description>Maintain a Global Identity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 09:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Miller</title>
		<link>http://embraceunity.com/?p=205&#038;cpage=1#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embraceunity.com/?p=205#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Wanted to add some extra comments

Hive minds are totalitarian in the sense that conformity is mandated, and that conformity reaches down to the lowest levels of our existence... even if such conformity is divided into castes. 

I consider hive minds to be a subset of group minds in general. Something less totalitarian is more likely to occur. 

What would it look like? The most lenient types simply take the form of a network. Language is such a network. Mirror neurons also create a network in which information passes between individuals to such an extent that feedback loops of emotions occur in society. For example, in Britain they did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/12/05/happiness.social.network/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a study on happiness&lt;/a&gt; to see if happiness is contagious.... and they found it definitely is.

What sorts of new networks and languages will we create? We already have the Internet and Massively Multiplayer Online Games. It seems likely that brain wave readers, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality will progress to a stage of similar profundity.

Artificial Intelligences would almost undoubtedly organize into group minds, but it will likely be in the form of modular components rather than assimilating each into a single monolithic framework.

In order for human beings to achieve that type of organization, we would need something better than mirror neurons and spoken language. These are low fidelity. They are slow to filter out between large groups of people and they are highly liable to misinterpretation. Thus brain-computer interfaces are essential for modularity with high fidelity. Yet, being a network, each person only receives signals from the collective from which it can autonomously determine what to do. 

The benefit, though, is that there would never be any disagreement about what exactly is occuring.... just disagreements about core values. Much like in the Open Source ecosystem, divergent values would lead to &quot;forks.&quot; Majoritarian Democracy, Consensus Democracy, Oligarchy, and even Autocracy are all possible organizational modes.

Of course we are already group minds in some ways since there are nested levels of consciousness. The meta &lt;a href=&quot;http://embraceunity.com/?p=413&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I Am You&lt;/a&gt; god-level (if it exists), and then levels below that (group minds)... all the way down toward the microqualia that we simultaneously carry in our individual heads (a la the &lt;a href=&quot;http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/medicine/split-brain/background.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;split brain&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanted to add some extra comments</p>
<p>Hive minds are totalitarian in the sense that conformity is mandated, and that conformity reaches down to the lowest levels of our existence&#8230; even if such conformity is divided into castes. </p>
<p>I consider hive minds to be a subset of group minds in general. Something less totalitarian is more likely to occur. </p>
<p>What would it look like? The most lenient types simply take the form of a network. Language is such a network. Mirror neurons also create a network in which information passes between individuals to such an extent that feedback loops of emotions occur in society. For example, in Britain they did <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/12/05/happiness.social.network/index.html" rel="nofollow">a study on happiness</a> to see if happiness is contagious&#8230;. and they found it definitely is.</p>
<p>What sorts of new networks and languages will we create? We already have the Internet and Massively Multiplayer Online Games. It seems likely that brain wave readers, Augmented Reality, and Virtual Reality will progress to a stage of similar profundity.</p>
<p>Artificial Intelligences would almost undoubtedly organize into group minds, but it will likely be in the form of modular components rather than assimilating each into a single monolithic framework.</p>
<p>In order for human beings to achieve that type of organization, we would need something better than mirror neurons and spoken language. These are low fidelity. They are slow to filter out between large groups of people and they are highly liable to misinterpretation. Thus brain-computer interfaces are essential for modularity with high fidelity. Yet, being a network, each person only receives signals from the collective from which it can autonomously determine what to do. </p>
<p>The benefit, though, is that there would never be any disagreement about what exactly is occuring&#8230;. just disagreements about core values. Much like in the Open Source ecosystem, divergent values would lead to &#8220;forks.&#8221; Majoritarian Democracy, Consensus Democracy, Oligarchy, and even Autocracy are all possible organizational modes.</p>
<p>Of course we are already group minds in some ways since there are nested levels of consciousness. The meta <a href="http://embraceunity.com/?p=413" rel="nofollow">I Am You</a> god-level (if it exists), and then levels below that (group minds)&#8230; all the way down toward the microqualia that we simultaneously carry in our individual heads (a la the <a href="http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/medicine/split-brain/background.html" rel="nofollow">split brain</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Applied Social Ecology &#124; The Seed of the Tree of Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://embraceunity.com/?p=205&#038;cpage=1#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Applied Social Ecology &#124; The Seed of the Tree of Tomorrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embraceunity.com/?p=205#comment-500</guid>
		<description>[...] Live and let live. Decentralized communities have a distinct advantage when it comes to resiliency. Much less information is needed to govern a small community than a large one, and having multiple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Live and let live. Decentralized communities have a distinct advantage when it comes to resiliency. Much less information is needed to govern a small community than a large one, and having multiple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Applied Social Ecology by Edward Miller &#171; 2bloggen.org</title>
		<link>http://embraceunity.com/?p=205&#038;cpage=1#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Applied Social Ecology by Edward Miller &#171; 2bloggen.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embraceunity.com/?p=205#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] bloom, and all that jazz. Decentralized communities have a distinct advantage when it comes to resiliency. Much less information is needed to govern a small community than a large one, and having multiple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloom, and all that jazz. Decentralized communities have a distinct advantage when it comes to resiliency. Much less information is needed to govern a small community than a large one, and having multiple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Applied Social Ecology &#62; EmbraceUnity</title>
		<link>http://embraceunity.com/?p=205&#038;cpage=1#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Applied Social Ecology &#62; EmbraceUnity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embraceunity.com/?p=205#comment-337</guid>
		<description>[...] bloom, and all that jazz. Decentralized communities have a distinct advantage when it comes to resiliency. Much less information is needed to govern a small community than a large one, and having multiple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloom, and all that jazz. Decentralized communities have a distinct advantage when it comes to resiliency. Much less information is needed to govern a small community than a large one, and having multiple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
